Should you use Military force to remove Saddam Hussein’s government?
The pros and cons of war in Iraq are; Saddam Hussein has run a cruel dictatorship of the country in Iraq for over 20 years. He started wars aligned with neighboring countries of Iran and Kuwait, top to the death of 1.5 million Muslims. Twelve years and 17 resolutions soon, world opinion is near unanimous that he hasn’t gotten rid of his weapon or fulfilled the conditions of the cease-fire. The Resolution was unanimously passed a few months ago mandating full disarmament. The resent disagreement involves essentially how Saddam should be disarmed-by force or by continued U.N. weapons inspections.
Yes, the pros and cons of war in Iraq are:
1. Saddam’s human rights record his among the worst in the world and in history.
2. Saddam is a main threat to solidity of the Middle East.
3. Saddam is associated with terrorists and many supply them with weapons of mass destruction.
4. To mail a powerful message to other dictators.
5. The Arab world could be set up in a model democracy probably top to Arab governments to go with the costume.
6. Penalizing prices could totally go down with a short winning movement.
7. We can remove our troops from Saudi Arabia and much of the Arab world if he is gone.
8. Maybe the widest terrorist sponsors were Iran and Syria.
9. Majority of Arab governments want Saddam to disappear.
10. Fire on U.S. was continuing by Saddam.
11. Saddam doesn’t want to go back the treasure he stole from Kuwait throughout the Gulf war.
12. The war is higher when it comes from the cost in lives and dollars of control.
13. The integrity of President Bush is at risk.
14. Saddam deserves to be punished for the death and despair he caused to the world.
15. The U.N’s integrity veracity is at stake.
No, the pros and cons of war in Iraq are:
1. Many soldiers and Iraqi civilians will be killed.
2. The final cost of executing the war may be prohibitive.
3. Weapons of mass destructions could be launched at Israel.
4. Anti American sentiment could rise in the world.
5. Hard evidence of Saddam’s weapons of mass destructions still hasn’t been found.
6. The post Saddam Iraq situations could be uneven and destructive.
7. A defensive attack is against what the U.S. stands for.
8. Saddam can be neutralized without the cruelty of a war.
9. The problems with the economic security.
10. Top to even higher oil prices could Saddam burn down oil fields.
11. Price strikes from Al Qaeda and other terrorist could occur.
12. U.S.-friendly Arab government could become unbalanced.